Stet vs Storyblok

Side by side.

The same seven questions, asked of both. Checked against published documentation in July 2026.

Question	Stet	SStoryblok
Who models the content	Stet Marketing, in the UI. Collections, maps and fields with no deploy.	Storyblok Marketing, in the UI, modelling components rather than plain fields.
Types in your app	Stet A typed client generated from the live model by a Vite plugin.	Storyblok Generated from the component schema by a CLI, as a step you own.
When the model changes	Stet A removed field becomes a deprecation in the types. The build stays green.	Storyblok No deprecation path in the generated types.
Analytics	Stet Included. First-party and cookieless, through your own infrastructure.	Storyblok Not included.
AI	Stet Included. Drafting, suggestions and delegated tasks, approving every write.	Storyblok AI credits, allocated per plan.
Hosting and licence	Stet Hosted cloud or self-hosted. Open source.	Storyblok Hosted only. Not open source.
How pricing works	Stet $10 per user per month. Free to self-host.	Storyblok Free for one seat, then $99 per month for five, then $15 per extra seat, with traffic and request caps per tier.

What Storyblok does better.

The visual editor is excellent, and for teams that assemble pages from components rather than write structured entries it is hard to beat.

1import { stet } from '@stetcms/client';2 3const post = await stet.posts.get('hello-world');4 5post.

The fields from that collection, arriving in the editor as typed properties on the generated client.

When to pick Storyblok instead.

Pick Storyblok if visual, in-page editing is the requirement your content team will judge the project on. Stet deliberately does not build that: rendering belongs to your app.

Other comparisons.

The same seven questions, asked of everything else teams weigh Stet against.