Stet vs Prismic

Side by side.

The same seven questions, asked of both. Checked against published documentation in July 2026.

Question	Stet	PPrismic
Who models the content	Stet Marketing, in the UI. Collections, maps and fields with no deploy.	Prismic Both. In the UI, or through Slice Machine in your repository.
Types in your app	Stet A typed client generated from the live model by a Vite plugin.	Prismic Generated by Slice Machine for your slices and documents.
When the model changes	Stet A removed field becomes a deprecation in the types. The build stays green.	Prismic No deprecation path in the generated types.
Analytics	Stet Included. First-party and cookieless, through your own infrastructure.	Prismic Not included.
AI	Stet Included. Drafting, suggestions and delegated tasks, approving every write.	Prismic An MCP server and CLI, so coding agents can model and populate content.
Hosting and licence	Stet Hosted cloud or self-hosted. Open source.	Prismic Hosted only. Not open source.
How pricing works	Stet $10 per user per month. Free to self-host.	Prismic Per repository, not per person: free for one user, $10 per month for three, rising to $675 for unlimited.

What Prismic does better.

Slice Machine keeps the component library and the content model in step, and the per-repository pricing is very cheap for a small team on one site.

1import { stet } from '@stetcms/client';2 3const post = await stet.posts.get('hello-world');4 5post.

The fields from that collection, arriving in the editor as typed properties on the generated client.

When to pick Prismic instead.

Pick Prismic if you run one large marketing site with a big team, where per-repository pricing works out cheaper than paying per seat.

Other comparisons.

The same seven questions, asked of everything else teams weigh Stet against.